English (United Kingdom)French (Fr)Russian (CIS)Espa
Home Forum Neurohacking The Bay video blog about intelligence

Login

      
      |
If you want to register, please send a mail introducing yourself to nha.council at our domain name (omitting the "www" of course).

sirhinojo
useravatar
User Info

video blog about intelligence

hi dudes, you could check out this guys videos.  he talks about neuro-research.  and the stuff about working memory  (n6?) and fluid intelligence (intelligence?) interactions is interesting and seems relevant to neurohacking. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E98dhjXo-s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn51c_7c2jE


Administrator has disabled public posting
Sakiro
useravatar
User Info

Re: video blog about intelligence

Hey, yep i knew that videos from before, are good i think, he have a lot more too in his channel.

Is obvious that there was a "before and after" in the mainstream scene after the jaeggi study about working memory training (n-back) increasing fluid intelligence?

The problem is in the main-stream vocabulary  iq = fluid intelligence? and if that is the only tool to measure an increase of intelligence from working memory training you are wrong.

After that there was some Support papers and Criticsm that original study like for example this one

Critic

Code:

Colom 2010


“Improvement in working memory is not related to increased intelligence scores” (full text) trained 173 students on WM tasks (such as the reading span task) with randomized difficulties, and found no linked IQ improvement; the IQ tests were “the Advanced Progressive Matrices Test (APM) along with the abstract reasoning (DAT-AR), verbal reasoning (DAT-VR), and spatial relations (DAT-SR) subtests from the Differential Aptitude Test Battery”. None were speeded as in Jaeggi 2008. Abstract:

    “The acknowledged high relationship between working memory and intelligence suggests common underlying cognitive mechanisms and, perhaps, shared biological substrates. If this is the case, improvement in working memory by repeated exposure to challenging span tasks might be reflected in increased intelligence scores. Here we report a study in which 288 university undergraduates completed the odd numbered items of four intelligence tests on time 1 and the even numbered items of the same tests one month later (time 2). In between, 173 participants completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WMC) tasks imposing high processing demands (STM–WMC group). 115 participants also completed three sessions, separated by exactly one week, but comprising verbal, numerical, and spatial simple speed tasks (processing speed, PS, and attention, ATT) with very low processing demands (PS-ATT group). The main finding reveals increased scores from the pre-test to the post-test intelligence session (more than half a standard deviation on average). However, there was no differential improvement on intelligence between the STM-WMC and PS-ATT groups.”

And of course you can see a lot of different opinions of the results from the people who start training it with the brainworkshop program (a software to train working memory).

So i think that the reason of that kind of different result can be just different people with a totally different 'start point' brain wise?, i mean different scores in their brain networks, so probably the guys who has the brain more balanced (rear networks?) could have better improvement, and the others not see any change.


Administrator has disabled public posting

Board Info

User Info:   Newest User :  sailing 1   Members Online: 0   Guests Online: 320
Topic
New
Locked
Topic
New
Locked
Sticky
Active
New/Active
Sticky
Active
New/Active
New/Closed
New Sticky
Closed/Active
New/Locked
New Sticky
Locked/Active
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky Active Locked
Active/Sticky
Sticky/Locked
Sticky/Active/Locked